After all these years of speculation about his true
identity, it seems that Jack The Ripper finally has a name.
It will be 132 years this November since the world's most
famous—perhaps infamous is a more
appropriate word—serial killer murdered and mutilated his fifth and final
victim. Mary Kelly was only 25 years old when her body was discovered on
November 9, 1888, in London's East End Whitechapel neighborhood.
For over a century theories about his identity ran rampant,
including such candidates as a member of the royal family, a prominent surgeon,
a famous artist, an American doctor, and a Polish immigrant living in the
neighborhood. One case was even made for Jack The Ripper being a woman. I had
always thought the Polish immigrant was Jack The Ripper. However, after seeing
a documentary about the search for Jack The Ripper's true identity, I started
leaning toward the American doctor as the culprit. Francis Tumblety was an
Irish-born American medical quack who earned a small fortune posing as an East
Indian herb doctor throughout the United States and Canada. He was in England
at the time of the murders and when he returned to the U.S., the London murders
stopped and a similar series of murder started in the U.S.
I find it interesting that most images of Jack The Ripper,
whether drawings from that time or modern depictions, show him dressed in
formal gentleman's attire including a cape and top hat. A man dressed like that
on the streets of Whitechapel at night in 1888 would definitely have stood out to
anyone living in the area as someone who didn't belong there.
Thanks to modern forensic science, a DNA match shows that
Jack The Ripper is Aaron Kozminski, a Polish Jew who fled to London in the
1880s. He died from gangrene at the age of 53 while incarcerated in Leavesden
Asylum. Kozminski was one of the names on the list of strong suspects from the
time of the murders, but the police never had enough evidence to arrest him.
Russell Edwards, author of Naming Jack The Ripper (published in 2014), bought a shawl in 2007
at an auction. Even though the shawl came without provenance, he was told that
it belonged to Catherine Eddowes, the Ripper's fourth victim, and had been
found near her body. After the auction, he obtained a letter from the previous
owner claiming his ancestor had been a police officer who was present at the
murder scene and had taken the shawl.
Edwards handed the shawl over to Dr. Jari Louhelainen, a
world-renowned expert in analyzing genetic evidence from historical crime
scenes. He tracked down a descendant of Catherine Eddowes and a British
descendant of Kozminski's sister, both of whom agreed to provide DNA. With a
DNA match from the samples, the doctor stated that Aaron Kozminski was Jack The
Ripper.
The evidence has not yet been independently verified.
8 comments:
Excellent post. Finally, we know.
A very interesting post, and very well written :)
I have an acquaintance, who has some diaries of the best friend of her great, great grandfather who were both officers in the British Army. The friend, who for reasons I can't disclose, I shall call X as I am sworn to secrecy as to his identity, died on a march through India and as his best friend, his personal effects, including the diaries, were handed to him to get to family in Britain.On his return, the family wanted nothing to do with X or any of his effects and they refused to discuss him having banned him from them years before. The diaries were locked away, and eventually, through inheritances, ended up in the possession of my acquaintance.
This is a long involved story, but I am getting to the point. My friend, moved from the UK to Australia, and the diaries came with her as she has always been interested in antiques and history. A while ago, she approached me and offered the diaries to me to write a book. You see, in the diaries X admits to murdering a series of five women in London, and three previously in another city when he was stationed there but were never linked to Jack the Ripper.
Are the diaries genuine? They appear to be. While I have seen these volumes, and read the relevant chapters, unfortunately my friend withdrew the offer to release them, but I will keep trying. If they are genuine, it does explain why the murders stopped, because X was transferred to India, as a lot of troops were at that time. I do not have DNA evidence, or anything other than the word of my friend, and the books themselves. Are they forged? I have no idea, but it does make for a fantastic story, doesn't it?
I enjoyed your post, One of the reasons I write about serial killers is that we are fascinated by them, and have been for a very long time.
Fascinating! Thanks for sharing.
I watched a special that claimed it was a butcher, which would explain the blood on his clothes and why he was out in the wee morning hours.
It's still a mystery which fascinates us still.
Nightingale: Glad you enjoyed it.
Thanks for your comment.
Stephen: You're right, serial killers are fascinating subjects. Jack The Ripper, Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy, Jeffrey Dahmer, etc., and they seem to cross all social/economic/ethnic groups. Your friends diaries sound fascinating.
Thanks for your comment.
CB: Glad you enjoyed my post.
Thanks for your comment.
Janice: Kozminski, the Polish immigrant, was the butcher. He actually makes more sense than the others in the theories. He blended into the neighborhood and could go about unnoticed and being covered in blood would be normal for his job.
Thanks for your comment.
Post a Comment