Homer
In our
present age of instant information sources (both real and fake), it's easy to
search for the biography of a well-known person. However, it was not always
this way. The facts about many historical figures weren't written down until
years, sometimes decades or even centuries, after they allegedly lived. With
these large gaps of time, any evidence of the person's actual existence may be
nothing more than stories with an absence of any real proof.
Here is
a list of famous people whose names you will recognize but who may never have
existed at all, at least not in their popular and commonly accepted form. This
list of 6 is only a small number of famous people who may or may not be real.
The original list I came across included 17 people.
Mulan
The tale
of a woman dressing as a man and fighting for a cause (whether family, country,
or religion) is a timeless theme (think Joan of Arc). Disney introduced movie
fans to the legend of Mulan, though she was already famous in Chinese
literature. It's commonly accepted that Mulan was a real person who actually
did this. But any evidence of this actually happening is scarce.
The book
Chinese Shadow Theatre: History, Popular
Religion, and Women Warriors says Mulan might have been a fictional
character based in part on Wei Huahu, an actual female warrior from ancient
China. As for Mulan herself, the earliest known reference was in an ancient song,
The Battle of Mulan. But it doesn't
specify when she lived, gives few details of the actual battles she fought, and
didn't give a full name for her other than Mulan.
Then
there's a text called LienĂ¼ zhuan
translated as Exemplary Women of Early
China, written by Liu Xiang around 18 BC, and packed with over 120
biographies of famous women from ancient China. Despite supposedly being a prominent
person, Mulan is not listed. Even though she supposedly lived several hundred
years after Xiang first published his book, there's a section at the end for
supplemental biographies. No one has ever added Mulan, even though her alleged exploits
were quite exceptional.
Shakespeare
Surely
the great William Shakespeare was a real person. He has lots of writings and there
are portraits of him. So, how could he not be real? I'm been to
Stratford-Upon-Avon in England and have seen the house said to be his. Surprisingly,
many people are convinced that "William Shakespeare" was a pen name,
and whoever wrote those stories might be lost to history.
As presented
on PBS, there was a man named William Shakespeare, but we know little about
him. We don't know where he learned to write, how he learned so much about law,
politics, and history, and his will mentioned no plays or sonnets, which you'd
think would be foremost on his mind. It sounds like the real Shakespeare didn't
write much more than the daily to do
list. If true, then who is the real Shakespeare? Plenty of candidates have
emerged over the years, like Francis Bacon, Ben Johnson, and Christopher
Marlowe, but these possibilities haven't stuck.
There's
another legitimate possibility in Edward de Vere—the Earl of Oxford. According
to J. Thomas Looney, a schoolteacher who uncovered a great deal about the man,
Vere wrote poetry that reads much like what is attributed to Shakespeare.
According to this theory, Vere used an assumed name because being one of the nobility
he didn't want to be associated with a low-brow art like playwriting. Then,
when he died, his followers published his plays under the pen name of some
random commoner named William Shakespeare who had died years before.
Robin Hood
The
legendary English folk hero Robin Hood is well-known for robbing from the rich
and giving to the poor, residing in Sherwood Forest with his band of merry men,
and wooing Maid Marian. The stories are certainly fictitious, but was Robin
Hood a real person or simply based on one? It's impossible to say if any one individual
inspired the legend's creation. The stories are either totally invented, or are
a combination of elements taken from different historical sources.
Identifying
a single person as the basis for the famous outlaw becomes even more difficult
as the stories began to grow in popularity in the 13th and 14th centuries.
Various English outlaws began calling themselves Robin Hood. Nevertheless, some
historians speculate that Robin Hood was based at least in part on nobleman
Fulk FitzWarin, who rebelled against King John (one of Robin Hood's foes).
FitzWarin's life was later turned into its own medieval tale, Fouke le Fitz Waryn, which holds some
similarities to the Robin Hood stories. If he was the basis, then a name change
was a good decision. The name Fulk FitzWarin doesn't exactly strike fear into
the hearts of villains.
William Tell
William
Tell is a Swiss folk hero who allegedly lived in Switzerland during the early
14th century, when the Hapsburg dynasty of Austria ruled the land. As the story
goes, an Austrian official placed a hat on a pole in city of Altdorf and
commanded every Swiss subject to remove their caps in a show of respect as they
passed by it. One day, William Tell, a local peasant accompanied by his son,
refused to comply. In response, the Austrians forced him to shoot an apple off
his son's head at 120 paces or face execution. Tell loaded his crossbow and
skillfully shot the apple. He then went on to lead a small revolt against the
Austrians.
Tell is
essentially the Swiss version of Robin Hood and, much like the outlaw of
Sherwood Forest, he probably never existed. The apple story is extremely
similar to a Viking folktale, which most likely was imported to Switzerland at
some point and used by Swiss patriots as a rallying cry against their Austrian
rulers.
Homer
Homer (pictured at top) is
the Greek poet who wrote two of the books that your English teacher probably
required you to read in high school—The
Iliad and The Odyssey. Despite
the popularity and importance of these mythological epics, their author remains
shrouded in mystery. Homer almost certainly was not the creator of these tales,
which likely preceded him by about 1,000 years. He was simply the first to
write them down. As for the poet himself, some say Homer was blind, while at
least one author argues that Homer was actually a woman.
Some
historians believe that Homer was not a single person, but rather a group of
Greek scholars. In the end, we will probably never know the answer, but the
legacy of Homer's works will continue.
King Arthur
We're
all familiar with the Arthurian legend. Even if you haven't read the stories,
you likely saw Monty Python and the Holy Grail
or are familiar with the theatrical production and subsequent movie, Camelot. In any case, the British king
is said to have claimed the sword, Excalibur, from the Lady of the Lake and
found the aforementioned Holy Grail. These stories are most likely a mishmash
of folklore, but was the Arthur of legend based on a real man? The first tales
of Arthur appeared in the ninth century and chronicle his battle against the
invading Saxon armies, so it's likely that the individuals who served as the basis
for Arthur lived sometime before then. Some historians suggest the Roman
military commander Lucius Artorius Castus as a possible candidate. Others
suggest Riothamus, king of the Britons during the fifth century.
John Henry
John
Henry—the steel-driving man has been immortalized in folk music since the
1800s. His Ballad of John Henry tells
the story of an ex-slave working on the railroad. He challenged a steam drill
to see which could work faster, and he won. He died soon afterwards from sheer
exhaustion. The greatest heroes die in the end, and Henry's story has ascended
to near-myth because of it.
Thing
is, he might actually be a myth. As NPR explains, John Henry is almost
certainly a "tall tale," though one based on "historical
circumstance." There were obviously men working on railroads back in the
1800s, and steam drills were eventually introduced as a way to speed up labor
and reduce costs. More than likely, the rail workers disapproved of a machine
taking their jobs, though it's unproven if anybody actually attempted to work
faster than one.
10 comments:
Very cool! I personally love the theory that Shakespeare was a woman.
Love these interesting articles!
Great post! Gave me lots to think about - thanks.
Very interesting post! I can see how over the years some of these "names" have become larger-than-life, people adding tales to the legends. Whether real or not, the name and the legend lives on.
Cat
Real interesting reading. I know about most of these, but I really did think John Henry was read--from Big John, Big bad John song.
Janice~
Jennifer: There are several theories of historical characters (real or myth) possibly having been a woman. Makes for interesting speculation. There is even one theory that there had been a female Pope (Pope Joan).
Thanks for your comment.
C. Becker: Glad you enjoyed the post.
Thanks for your comment.
Ashantay: Glad you enjoyed it.
Thanks for your comment.
Cat: That's it...even if the base information about the story is true, people add to the story over the years and it grows and expands. Whatever the truth might have been to begin with, the story/myth lives on
Thanks for your comment.
Janice: John Henry might have been real, but the time/place/circumstances added to the real to create the "new" real and the myth was born. I remember that Jimmy Dean song.
Thanks for your comment.
Post a Comment