Is the U.S. the most lawsuit-happy country in the world? Am
I the only one who is sick and tired of reading/hearing about frivolous
lawsuits where people are suing someone (or more often a company that they
assume has deep pockets) for something that's the result of their own stupidity
or carelessness? Apparently it's easier to sue someone rather than take
responsibility for their own actions. Of course, the humor element of the
lawsuit content is fun, but the reality of the cost to tax payers and having the
court calendar clogged with this stuff isn't funny. It just seems to me that in
something like the last maybe 20 years frivolous lawsuits have skyrocketed—not
only in number, but also in how ludicrous and ridiculous they are. There is the
reality that many reports of frivolous lawsuits are nothing more than internet
hoaxes, but there are as many that are sadly legitimate.
Ever wonder why those weird warnings are sometimes on the
packages of items you purchase? Things like telling you not to operate various
electrical appliances while in the bathtub, something that seems so blatantly
obvious that it shouldn't require a special warning. But, obviously the
manufacturer was sued at some time by someone who did just that.
And why the warning to tell you that hot coffee is actually
hot? Well, that goes back to another lawsuit.
I think my conscious disgust with frivolous lawsuits dates
back to the infamous McDonald's hot coffee lawsuit of several years ago. Woman
buys a cup of coffee at McDonalds then puts the cup between her legs in her car
so she could drive. Well…surprise, surprise…the coffee spilled and burned her.
And, as seems to be the rule today rather than the exception, she certainly
didn't take any responsibility for what happened. After all, it was McDonald's
fault because their hot coffee was actually hot.
So she sued them. And the clincher is that a jury awarded her an obscene amount
of money thus rewarding her for being irresponsible and foolish.
And here's one I read in a news report a few months ago. In
March 2012 a man died of heart failure while engaged in a threesome with a
woman (not his wife) and another man. The dead man's family sued his
cardiologist claiming the doctor should have warned him not to become involved
in strenuous physical activity. The man had been to the cardiologist the week
before with chest pains. The doctor determined he was at high risk of having
clogged heart arteries and ordered a nuclear stress test for 8 days later. The
threesome and the man's death occurred the day before the scheduled stress
test. And in a totally insane action (in my humble opinion), the jury actually awarded
the man's family $3 million in damages even though the doctor had instructed
his patient to "avoid exertional activity until after the nuclear stress
test was completed." Apparently he should have explained that avoiding exertional activity included
staying away from sexual threesomes.
And there's the guy who, in 1991, tried to sue
Anheuser-Busch for $10,000 because, after drinking large quantities of Bud
Light, beautiful women didn't come to life in tropical settings and pursue him
like they did in the commercials.
As we all know, staged haunted houses at Halloween are there
for the specific purpose of scaring people. But in 2000 a woman sued Universal
Studios for $15,000 because their Halloween Horror Nights haunted house caused
her "extreme fear, mental anguish, and emotional distress." Makes you
wonder exactly what she thought something called Halloween Horror Nights Haunted
House would be.
A woman sued Starbucks for serving her tea that was
"unreasonably hot." I wonder which came first…McDonalds or Starbucks?
An Israeli woman sued a television station for predicting
fair weather. Because of the forecast, she dressed in light clothes but later
that day the weather turned cooler and it rained. She ended up sick and had to
miss work so she sued for $1000. Bottom line, she sued over an act of
nature…and won. I do have to admit that it's nice to come across one that didn't
happen in the U.S.
And speaking of suing for an act of nature, isn't that like
suing God?
A man living in Minnesota thinks he's a god of some sort. He
became upset after seeing David Copperfield and David Blaine perform their
magic acts and sued both of them for using his "godly powers." (this
is me shaking my head in disbelief)
Two teen girls in Colorado decided to bake some cookies and
share them with neighbors. One neighbor woman was so shocked by two 15-year-old
girls at her door at 10:30pm that she had an anxiety attack. She sued for
medical expenses and won $930 to cover the expense of her trip to the emergency
room but was denied money for "pain and suffering."
And here's a truly bizarre one. A woman standing on a train
platform was pelted by pieces of an unfortunate young man who had just been hit
by an oncoming train. She tried to sue the victim
but the judge dismissed the suit because the young man had no way of knowing
where his body parts were going to land…due to the fact that he was dead.
A fugitive murder suspect kidnapped a couple and claimed he
entered into a verbal contract with them where they would hide him from the law
in exchange for an unspecified amount of money. The couple turned him in and
during the subsequent arrest he was shot. The couple sued the fugitive for
$75,000 for trespassing, intrusion, and emotional distress. He countersued for
$235,000 claiming the couple violated their verbal contract with him. The judge
dismissed the fugitive's counterclaim because the couple could not have entered
into that contract as hiding a fugitive was illegal.
And here's one I came across earlier this month. A woman in
Spain is suing eBay for $11,000. She claimed she owned the sun and even went to
a local court and found a notary who backed up her claim. As the notarized
legal owner of the sun, she threatened solar power users saying she was going
to charge them. She also started selling land parcels on the sun using eBay. Of
course, there is no land on the sun, just gas that's like 27 million degrees Fahrenheit.
When her activities came to their attention, eBay shut her down for violating
their intangible goods policy. She claimed eBay collected their fee on her
sales [people actually paid money for this?] while not giving her money to her. She's now in the running for most frivolous
lawsuit of 2015.
9 comments:
It makes you afraid to leave the house. Where do they find the jurors who go along with these claims. I think people who file frivolous suits should be sued.
Sandra: That's what I'm wondering, too. Who are these people who give out these huge sums of money to foolish, irresponsible people as a reward for their disdeeds. No wonder so many people refuse to accept responsibility for their own actions. With the exception of Small Claims Court (no lawyers and no jury), the people filing these frivolous lawsuits need to have an attorney do it...perhaps attorneys who take on these lawsuits against companies assuming the company will settle out of court and avoid all the hassle should be fined, too.
Thanks for your comment.
This falls into the what-happened-to-common-sense category. Thanks for sharing, Samantha.
I watched a news documentary on the McDonald's law suit. Was very interesting and showed how it was not just a frivolous suit.
Stanalei: You're absolutely right. It does seem that common sense has done a disappearing act.
Thanks for your comment.
Anonymous: I haven't seen or heard anything about the McDonald's lawsuit for quite a while. What new information did the documentary reveal?
Thanks for your comment.
The McDonalds one gets me mad every time I think about it!
Charlotte: Yes, that jury decision/monetary award was quite an eye opener.
Thanks for your comment.
Samantha this was truly an eye opener. I can't believe that any of these lawsuit were won. amazing.
Post a Comment