Last week we talked about jobs from the past that have
already gone by the wayside. And this week is part 2 of my obsolete jobs blog. We're
going to talk about jobs that are predicted to be nearly gone in the next 20
years or at least out-of-date.
What education should you get to best position yourself for
the coming decades? What line of work should you be in, and which professions
have no future and will disappear? What does the brave new world have to offer?
Here is a list I saw of jobs predicted to be obsolete in 20
years—some logical, some surprising, and some seem a little far-fetched.
1. Actor: Actors
in film and television will be replaced by completely realistic animations. Stage actors will of course exist for a while longer,
and will probably be performing in many parts of the world simultaneously,
through the anticipated widespread use of holograms. [I'm not really seeing
either of these end results as being on the immediate horizon…the capability yes, but the
reality no]
2. Cashier: Many
grocery stores already have self-operated check stands, but that’s just a
tradeoff between a cashier doing the job and you doing it yourself, making your
groceries cheaper. [remember when ATMs first became available and we were encouraged to trust those machines and told it was a
good thing because it would save money and in today's world we're charged ATM
fees] In the future, check stands will
be fully automated. Just leave your groceries on the belt and let the robot
tally it up many times faster than a human ever could. As a consequence, lines
will be much less of a nuisance as they become increasingly non-existent.
3. Construction worker:
Construction work can be hazardous, so why should humans risk their lives doing
it? In the future, insurance companies certainly won’t cover a construction
firm that takes such unnecessary risks. Robotics are becoming increasingly
sophisticated, and they’ll be constructing buildings cheaper, and far more
rapidly than humans.
4. Soldier: Compared
to sophisticated robots, humans are relatively susceptible to mental
deficiencies such as nervousness, pride, stupidity, miscalculation, and slow
reaction time. In other words: computers can do the same job more efficiently,
without risking human life, and without apprehension. [this one is surely going
to be dependent on perfected artificial intelligence…that instant decision
about a totally unexpected situation]
5. Security guard:
Buy a strong, obedient robot that can see in the dark, never falls asleep on
duty, and won’t accept bribes, to protect your home or your business.
6. Car mechanic: Cars
will become too technically complex to repair for humans. Computers and robots
will take care of it. Eventually, cars will fix themselves. They've already
started driving themselves.
7. Trash collector:
Instead of two slow, weak and unhappy guys tossing trash into the back of the
truck, a single fast, strong and highly motivated robot will complete the
process in five seconds. [my trash pickup has recently been reduced to a one
man operation and that one man is the driver—newly issued trash receptacles,
instructions about where/how they are placed at the curb, and trucks with
automatic arms that pick up the receptacle and dump the contents into the truck
then return the receptacle to the curb]
8. Assembly line
worker: Automakers, textile producers and furniture factories (to mention
some industries) around the world are cutting costs by reducing their number of
salary, pension and insurance absorbing employees, and shifting focus to
mechanical solutions.
9. Toll booth
operator: Many developed countries have already successfully implemented money-and-time
saving automatic toll booths with video detection and post
payment/subscriptions.
10. Prostitute:
The completely lifelike robot girlfriends will satisfy the demand for carnal services in
the future. [Westworld has become
reality?]
11. Nature
photographer: Close-ups from inside the lion's cave and year-long stakeouts
without the need for food or shelter are the advantages of photographic robots.
[but does all this robotic perfection replace the creative and artistic eye
contributed by the human element?]
12. Surgeon: Why
let a nervous, shaky doctor with poor eyesight cut you with knives and fool
around inside of you, when a steady handed, ice cool and accurate robot can do
it instead? Medical malpractice lawsuits cost the American health providers
some $30 billion each year. This will end.
13. Pilot: Computerized
pilots are not like regular pilots in that they are not prone to human error,
i.e. they won't spill coffee on the instrument panels in the cockpit or
miscalculate their landing angle. Nor do they need good visibility to fly, as
their millimeter-accurate GPS and sensor systems will guide them blindly to
their destination. Obviously, they will have to prove their merit before plane
passengers, and by extension airlines, can trust them.
14. Film processor:
Even today it seems absurd to have a full time employee engaged in nothing but processing
film. In fact, it has become difficult to find a local place to process your
film and equally difficult to find a place to purchase 35mm film for your old
film camera. And also along those lines, most modern movie theaters are rapidly
moving away from film which makes a projectionist also on the track toward
being obsolete.
15. Librarian: Libraries
will soon look very different. Why have a library containing 50,000 paper made
books when you can have 50 million of them in virtual form, which you can
access with your library card and download to your kindle or iPad. There will
not be any need for humans to process the lending of books.
16. Call center
operator: By 2029, when computers are scheduled to match human
intelligence, a microchip will call your house and argue that you do in fact
need flood insurance. [I get dozens of computer dialed calls now that play
recorded messages]
17. News anchor: No
mispronunciations, no misunderstandings, no Freudian slips, just a perfectly
articulate teleprompter with an attractive face. [some more of the 'no actor'
technology of item number 1?]
18. Mailman: Who
sends snail-mail these days? Mostly nostalgic pen pals. While we may have a
small segment left of the paper mail industry, most of the things we use the
mail for is transitioning to or has already moved completely online: Bills,
public notices, and business-letters. Although, we’ll still need package
delivery at least until nanotechnology enables us to send and download material
objects like we send files today, in 30-40 years. [or at such time as we all
have 3D printers so we can purchase the article via the internet and print out
the item in our homes]
19. Waiters:
Robots don't have an attitude, won't spill your food, and don't need tips. They
can work tirelessly around the clock, be ultra-efficient and be called upon by
clicking a button in your menu.
20. Receptionist:
Artificial intelligence and robotics sciences are approaching a point where the
robots we can make will match humans in terms of intelligence. These robots
will be our faithful servants who perform the menial tasks, so humans can focus
on developing themselves.
Extra: Jobs that
will be outsourced to countries with inexpensive labor. Yes, these jobs will
still exist, but will be performed by personnel in countries that can offer
inexpensive, skilled labor.
Accountant
Auditor
Web designer
Engineer
Customer service
Many high-tech jobs
It seems that job predictions for the future usually include
something about freeing us up to have more leisure time to enjoy and spend with
family and friends. However, they don't say how an ever increasing
world population is supposed to earn a living in an arena of decreasing jobs.
4 comments:
Unfortunately, robots are only as intelligent as the human who programs them. I see a dichotomy here...thanks for the interesting look at the future.
Ashantay: I'm with you! I don't see several of these as being viable in the near future let alone in the short immediate future of 20 years.
Real artificial intelligence is not the accumulation and storage of vast amounts of facts and making choices based on what has historically worked or what is logical. It's also being able to synthesize the truly human element such as reason and the 'human response' rather than the technical aspect of the odds saying what would be the logical thing to do.
After all, computerized logic tells us that a broken clock has the correct time twice a day and is therefore the preferable choice over a clock that loses a second of time every day so that it is correct only once every huge amount of years.
Thanks for your comment.
And with whom will we chat as we go about our errands? Will the robot be programmed to commiserate with us about the late arrival of spring? Hmm, sounds a bit grim to me. Thanks for the interesting post!
Laura: Good question. Perhaps it will be like Luke and Han chatting with the androids. Or, on the down side, perhaps like HAL in 2001 Space Odyssey...that did not turn out well for the humans.
Thanks for your comment.
Post a Comment